Since
we all are living in Thailand, a country of long lived history and many
different cultures, it is quite common of us to see sacred places in our daily
life. There are many religious in Thailand and almost every one of them has
their own sacred version of structure such as temples and churches, each type
has their own characteristic that is almost impossible to see the same look on
different function. People elevate these places into a higher position among
others types of structure so that, redefine the function would be some kind of
an orthodox or what we call Profane.
The
concept of Profanity is when we try to redefine the concept of those untouchable
sacred structures, we are challenging all believes and knowledge that we were born
with. Profanity is like one of the unique perception that is not focused on
creating a completely new thing, actually it is about using the existing space
or form and then adds a new meaning into it. So far in my understanding, profanity
is one way to adapt and evolve for a building, also a very brave action choice
because playing with sacred places is not a common thing. There are so many
possibilities both good and bad ways on the results, and to be able to succeed
one good profanity building is risky and very challenging.
Profanity
in Thailand has many things to do with religions and cultures, and as I said
earlier that Thailand has a very long history so, it is quite hard to play with
these respective ancient architectures such as temples. There is one hotel in
Chiang Mai that actually plays with the traditional form of temple, duplicated
and redefined as a new luxury hotel. The hotel, in my opinion was a success in
term of creates new function and space while still able to preserve the unique
characteristic of the traditional temple. But there are always different
believes and opinion, some would say that the sacred temple should not be used
as anything rather than traditional use. Not just only in Buddhism but in
Christianity as well, there is a similar situation in a painting of angry Jesus
Christ. In the painting the god is getting angry because people have turned the
church into something else by selling things inside of it. He was mad by the
profanity of people that challenging this sacred house of god, it is considered
as disrespectful and ruined the real value of the architecture.
Profanity
also happens to other designs rather than religious places as well. One of a very
big example is from Rem Koolhaas. He is a well-known architect in terms of playful
and a little bit of a badass, in my opinion. His works has a very unique style
of getting people mad. The best example would be when he tries to create new
architecture using Mies Van de Rohe, a well-known and widely accepted among
architects as his inspiration. In the end, Rem managed to create a building
with a façade that totally blown people away, he chooses Mies Van de Rohe’s
face as a façade which is very unique way of inspiration. This is by far, has
been consider as a playful profanity, even he did not play with religious
believes but still Mies Van de Rohe is consider as one of the sacred and
respectful among architects.
So, I
would say that Profanity is not something that we can judge, it is in between
good and not good depends on different perspectives. It is just a way to of
redefining process that is very challenging and risky in order to obtain a very
successful one.
No comments:
Post a Comment